typewar

Stats on the Character Z

Ruler Of This Character

See all crowns.

Top Players At Identifying This Character

player	right	total	bayesian
axxm	100%	1,050	99.6%
swift	99.4%	1,096	99.0%
electricboogaloo	99.4%	779	98.9%
axm	99.1%	892	98.6%
mervil	99%	677	98.4%
brandon	98.8%	560	98.1%
astooge	99.3%	276	97.9%
kath61	98.3%	880	97.9%
@starkissberry	98.5%	466	97.7%
@figonni	98.1%	637	97.5%

Easiest Typefaces to Identify From This Character

typeface	right	total	bayesian
Georgia	96.6%	20,707	90.4%
Skia	97.5%	15,316	90.2%
Courier New	96.9%	9,418	89.6%
Andale Mono	95.4%	11,236	89.5%
Baskerville	90.3%	56,004	89.3%

Hardest Typefaces to Identify From This Character

typeface	right	total	bayesian
Helvetica Neue	78.9%	222,922	81.3%
Verdana	79.1%	206,626	81.5%
Times New Roman	85.6%	224,449	86.3%
Optima	86.2%	219,136	86.8%
Gill Sans	86.1%	77,802	87.3%

Easiest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character

typeface pair	right	total	bayesian
Futura vs Times New Roman	96.9%	20,876	96.2%
Baskerville vs Futura	98.9%	5,344	96.2%
Didot vs Gill Sans	97.8%	8,670	96.1%
Gill Sans vs Times New Roman	97.5%	8,603	95.9%
Futura vs Garamond	96.8%	14,876	95.9%
Baskerville vs Helvetica Neue	98.1%	5,337	95.7%
Baskerville vs Verdana	98%	5,311	95.6%
Baskerville vs Optima	97.7%	5,305	95.4%
Baskerville vs Gill Sans	97.5%	5,285	95.3%
Didot vs Futura	95.8%	20,330	95.2%

Hardest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character

typeface pair	right	total	bayesian
Helvetica Neue vs Verdana	49.3%	38,010	53.0%
Futura vs Gill Sans	60%	8,478	69.5%
Arial vs Helvetica Neue	52.5%	3,613	72.1%
Garamond vs Times New Roman	68.1%	15,093	72.7%
Baskerville vs Times New Roman	62.8%	6,348	73.3%
Arial vs Verdana	48.9%	2,326	75.0%
Didot vs Times New Roman	75%	28,971	76.9%
Gill Sans vs Verdana	70.9%	8,562	77.1%
Gill Sans vs Helvetica Neue	73.1%	8,477	78.7%
Futura vs Verdana	78.5%	20,109	80.5%