typewar

Stats on the Character Z

Ruler Of This Character

See all crowns.

Top Players At Identifying This Character

player	right	total	bayesian
axxm	100%	1,050	99.6%
swift	99.4%	1,096	99.0%
electricboogaloo	99.4%	779	98.9%
axm	99.1%	892	98.6%
mervil	99%	677	98.4%
brandon	98.8%	560	98.1%
astooge	99.3%	276	97.9%
kath61	98.3%	880	97.9%
@starkissberry	98.5%	466	97.7%
@figonni	98.1%	637	97.5%

Easiest Typefaces to Identify From This Character

typeface	right	total	bayesian
Georgia	96.6%	20,622	90.4%
Skia	97.5%	15,274	90.2%
Courier New	96.9%	9,418	89.6%
Andale Mono	95.4%	11,204	89.6%
Baskerville	90.3%	55,406	89.4%

Hardest Typefaces to Identify From This Character

typeface	right	total	bayesian
Helvetica Neue	79%	218,351	81.3%
Verdana	79.2%	202,273	81.6%
Times New Roman	85.7%	219,766	86.4%
Optima	86.3%	214,667	86.9%
Gill Sans	86.1%	76,765	87.3%

Easiest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character

typeface pair	right	total	bayesian
Futura vs Times New Roman	96.9%	20,434	96.2%
Baskerville vs Futura	98.9%	5,275	96.2%
Didot vs Gill Sans	97.8%	8,567	96.1%
Futura vs Garamond	96.9%	14,577	96.0%
Gill Sans vs Times New Roman	97.5%	8,474	95.9%
Baskerville vs Helvetica Neue	98.1%	5,271	95.7%
Baskerville vs Verdana	98.1%	5,234	95.7%
Baskerville vs Optima	97.7%	5,255	95.5%
Baskerville vs Gill Sans	97.6%	5,203	95.4%
Didot vs Futura	95.8%	19,901	95.2%

Hardest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character

typeface pair	right	total	bayesian
Helvetica Neue vs Verdana	49.3%	37,128	53.0%
Futura vs Gill Sans	59.9%	8,339	69.4%
Arial vs Helvetica Neue	52.6%	3,603	72.0%
Garamond vs Times New Roman	68.1%	14,806	72.7%
Baskerville vs Times New Roman	62.9%	6,267	73.4%
Arial vs Verdana	48.8%	2,316	74.8%
Didot vs Times New Roman	75.2%	28,320	77.1%
Gill Sans vs Verdana	71%	8,440	77.2%
Gill Sans vs Helvetica Neue	73.1%	8,358	78.7%
Futura vs Verdana	78.7%	19,716	80.7%