typewar

Stats on the Character Z

Ruler Of This Character

See all crowns.

Top Players At Identifying This Character

player	right	total	bayesian
axxm	100%	1,050	99.6%
swift	99.4%	1,096	99.0%
electricboogaloo	99.4%	779	98.9%
axm	99.1%	892	98.6%
mervil	99%	677	98.4%
brandon	98.8%	560	98.1%
astooge	99.3%	276	97.9%
kath61	98.3%	880	97.9%
@starkissberry	98.5%	466	97.7%
@figonni	98.1%	637	97.5%

Easiest Typefaces to Identify From This Character

typeface	right	total	bayesian
Georgia	96.6%	20,833	90.3%
Skia	97.5%	15,400	90.1%
Courier New	96.9%	9,418	89.5%
Andale Mono	95.4%	11,309	89.5%
Baskerville	90.2%	56,406	89.3%

Hardest Typefaces to Identify From This Character

typeface	right	total	bayesian
Helvetica Neue	78.8%	225,369	81.2%
Verdana	79%	208,919	81.5%
Times New Roman	85.6%	227,035	86.3%
Optima	86%	221,496	86.6%
Gill Sans	86.1%	78,239	87.3%

Easiest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character

typeface pair	right	total	bayesian
Futura vs Times New Roman	96.9%	21,102	96.2%
Baskerville vs Futura	98.8%	5,371	96.1%
Didot vs Gill Sans	97.7%	8,721	96.1%
Gill Sans vs Times New Roman	97.5%	8,650	95.9%
Futura vs Garamond	96.8%	15,016	95.9%
Baskerville vs Helvetica Neue	98.1%	5,368	95.7%
Baskerville vs Verdana	98%	5,341	95.6%
Baskerville vs Optima	97.7%	5,326	95.4%
Baskerville vs Gill Sans	97.5%	5,301	95.3%
Didot vs Futura	95.7%	20,533	95.2%

Hardest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character

typeface pair	right	total	bayesian
Helvetica Neue vs Verdana	49.3%	38,482	52.9%
Futura vs Gill Sans	60%	8,537	69.5%
Arial vs Helvetica Neue	52.8%	3,675	72.2%
Garamond vs Times New Roman	68.1%	15,209	72.7%
Baskerville vs Times New Roman	63.3%	6,492	73.5%
Arial vs Verdana	49%	2,343	75.1%
Didot vs Times New Roman	75%	29,343	76.9%
Gill Sans vs Verdana	70.8%	8,610	77.1%
Gill Sans vs Helvetica Neue	73.1%	8,526	78.7%
Futura vs Verdana	78.4%	20,321	80.4%