typewar
Stats on the Character C
people get this character right
85.6%
of the time
85.6%
of the time
this character has been seen
811,876
times
811,876
times
bayesian-adjusted average is
86.6%
right
86.6%
right
Ruler Of This Character
See all crowns.
Top Players At Identifying This Character
player | right | total | bayesian |
---|---|---|---|
axxm | 100% | 1,016 | 99.6% |
electricboogaloo | 99.9% | 839 | 99.4% |
mervil | 100% | 641 | 99.3% |
swift | 99.5% | 1,144 | 99.1% |
brandon | 99.4% | 537 | 98.6% |
axm | 99% | 958 | 98.6% |
Jd | 98.9% | 1,015 | 98.5% |
@damanique | 99% | 509 | 98.2% |
@blloyd | 99.2% | 375 | 98.1% |
bbctol | 98.7% | 639 | 98.1% |
Easiest Typefaces to Identify From This Character
typeface | right | total | bayesian |
---|---|---|---|
Georgia | 96.2% | 20,761 | 91.1% |
Skia | 97.4% | 15,553 | 91.0% |
Arial | 92.5% | 35,240 | 90.6% |
Monaco | 94.3% | 17,812 | 90.6% |
Courier New | 96.7% | 9,169 | 90.5% |
Hardest Typefaces to Identify From This Character
typeface | right | total | bayesian |
---|---|---|---|
Verdana | 79% | 201,834 | 81.8% |
Helvetica Neue | 82.4% | 220,259 | 84.2% |
Optima | 82.6% | 213,933 | 84.3% |
Times New Roman | 85.3% | 217,866 | 86.4% |
Gill Sans | 86.3% | 76,587 | 87.9% |
Easiest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character
typeface pair | right | total | bayesian |
---|---|---|---|
Baskerville vs Futura | 98.4% | 5,374 | 96.2% |
Didot vs Gill Sans | 97.6% | 8,365 | 96.2% |
Baskerville vs Helvetica Neue | 98.1% | 5,243 | 96.0% |
Baskerville vs Gill Sans | 98% | 5,221 | 95.9% |
Futura vs Times New Roman | 96.3% | 20,072 | 95.8% |
Arial vs Didot | 99.6% | 2,503 | 95.6% |
Arial vs Times New Roman | 99.5% | 2,510 | 95.6% |
Gill Sans vs Times New Roman | 96.7% | 8,672 | 95.6% |
Baskerville vs Verdana | 97.4% | 5,223 | 95.5% |
Arial vs Optima | 99.4% | 2,493 | 95.5% |
Hardest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character
typeface pair | right | total | bayesian |
---|---|---|---|
Helvetica Neue vs Verdana | 65.1% | 37,073 | 67.5% |
Gill Sans vs Verdana | 63.3% | 8,450 | 71.9% |
Optima vs Verdana | 71.8% | 37,438 | 73.6% |
Futura vs Gill Sans | 66.8% | 8,425 | 74.4% |
Didot vs Times New Roman | 73.4% | 27,814 | 75.6% |
Garamond vs Times New Roman | 72.1% | 14,744 | 76.1% |
Futura vs Verdana | 73.2% | 20,155 | 76.1% |
Helvetica Neue vs Optima | 78.9% | 43,085 | 79.9% |
Baskerville vs Times New Roman | 74.3% | 6,253 | 80.9% |
Futura vs Helvetica Neue | 78.9% | 20,057 | 81.0% |