typewar

Stats on the Character Q

Ruler Of This Character

See all crowns.

Top Players At Identifying This Character

player	right	total	bayesian
axxm	100%	1,052	99.4%
mervil	99.9%	672	99.0%
electricboogaloo	99.6%	837	98.9%
swift	99.3%	1,230	98.8%
kath61	99.1%	1,348	98.7%
@birkenfeld	99.7%	395	98.3%
@damanique	99.2%	528	98.2%
ch4rl13	98.9%	723	98.2%
axm	98.7%	909	98.1%
brandon	98.9%	536	97.9%

Easiest Typefaces to Identify From This Character

typeface	right	total	bayesian
Baskerville	92%	57,716	89.3%
Monaco	93.4%	19,720	88.4%
Andale Mono	93.8%	13,284	88.1%
Georgia	91.1%	22,942	88.0%
Skia	91.8%	17,279	88.0%

Hardest Typefaces to Identify From This Character

typeface	right	total	bayesian
Verdana	77.1%	204,674	79.7%
Times New Roman	77.4%	219,953	79.8%
Helvetica Neue	78.8%	222,015	80.8%
Optima	80.6%	215,224	82.2%
Garamond	84.7%	116,889	85.6%

Easiest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character

typeface pair	right	total	bayesian
Baskerville vs Futura	98.9%	5,422	95.6%
Baskerville vs Helvetica Neue	98.7%	5,239	95.4%
Baskerville vs Optima	97.3%	5,274	94.6%
Baskerville vs Verdana	96.9%	5,289	94.4%
Arial vs Didot	98.6%	2,552	94.0%
Didot vs Trebuchet MS	98.3%	2,107	93.5%
Baskerville vs Trebuchet MS	98%	2,081	93.4%
Optima vs Trebuchet MS	97.9%	2,096	93.3%
Arial vs Baskerville	97%	2,529	93.3%
Didot vs Lucida Grande	98.8%	1,670	93.3%

Hardest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character

typeface pair	right	total	bayesian
Helvetica Neue vs Verdana	61.3%	37,569	63.9%
Garamond vs Times New Roman	58.6%	14,889	64.8%
Optima vs Times New Roman	70.5%	43,227	72.0%
Didot vs Times New Roman	73.6%	28,069	75.5%
Gill Sans vs Verdana	70.9%	8,610	76.7%
Futura vs Helvetica Neue	75%	20,239	77.4%
Futura vs Verdana	75.6%	20,197	77.9%
Optima vs Verdana	76.7%	37,378	77.9%
Helvetica Neue vs Optima	77.9%	42,926	78.9%
Helvetica Neue vs Times New Roman	78.8%	45,297	79.7%