typewar

 
 
6,841
players
have been asked
10,390,467
questions
We've now launched
Quests
 

Stats on the Character m

people get this character right
93%
of the time
this character has been seen
28,289
times
bayesian-adjusted average is
91.2%
right

Ruler Of This Character

See all crowns.

Top Players At Identifying This Character

player right total bayesian
swift 99.6% 717 96.4%
@sardonicyouth 98.4% 752 95.5%
electricboogaloo 99.6% 512 95.4%
morrktus 97.3% 660 94.3%
cram 96.9% 731 94.2%
mervil 99.7% 359 94.1%
ellawren 96.5% 748 93.9%
@figonni 99.7% 330 93.8%
veezay 98.7% 395 93.8%
maybe 97.2% 532 93.6%

Easiest Typefaces to Identify From This Character

typeface right total bayesian
Didot 99.8% 2,531 96.1%
Optima 99.6% 2,537 96.0%
Futura 99% 2,490 95.7%
Georgia 98% 2,638 95.2%
Bembo 96.9% 2,556 94.6%

Hardest Typefaces to Identify From This Character

typeface right total bayesian
Roboto 55.4% 630 84.8%
Helvetica Neue 80.6% 3,549 85.4%
Arial 85.6% 2,912 88.7%
Verdana 88.9% 2,587 90.5%
Gill Sans 89.5% 2,489 90.9%

Easiest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character

typeface pair right total bayesian
Optima vs Times New Roman 100% 152 96.8%
Hoefler Text vs Optima 100% 148 96.7%
Baskerville vs Skia 100% 146 96.7%
Optima vs Palatino 100% 144 96.7%
Arial vs Bembo 100% 144 96.7%
Palatino vs Tahoma 100% 143 96.7%
Baskerville vs Futura 100% 142 96.6%
Baskerville vs Helvetica Neue 100% 141 96.6%
Arial vs Palatino 100% 140 96.6%
Bembo vs Optima 100% 139 96.6%

Hardest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character

typeface pair right total bayesian
Arial vs Helvetica Neue 51.8% 514 59.6%
Helvetica Neue vs Roboto 55.4% 630 61.5%
Tahoma vs Verdana 64.8% 213 75.0%
Garamond vs Hoefler Text 66.7% 183 77.1%
Lucida Grande vs Verdana 62.9% 124 77.7%
Lucida Grande vs Tahoma 62.4% 117 77.9%
Gill Sans vs Lucida Grande 63.2% 117 78.3%
Gill Sans vs Tahoma 63.8% 116 78.6%
Andale Mono vs Monaco 62.5% 88 80.1%
Gill Sans vs Verdana 68.9% 119 81.0%
 
Your score is
0
Level
1
Current streak
0
longest: None