typewar
Stats on the Character O
people get this character right
80.6%
of the time
80.6%
of the time
this character has been seen
827,339
times
827,339
times
bayesian-adjusted average is
83.2%
right
83.2%
right
Ruler Of This Character
See all crowns.
Top Players At Identifying This Character
player | right | total | bayesian |
---|---|---|---|
axxm | 100% | 1,062 | 99.4% |
electricboogaloo | 99.7% | 700 | 98.8% |
axm | 99% | 909 | 98.3% |
mervil | 98.5% | 660 | 97.6% |
swift | 97.4% | 1,136 | 96.9% |
@figonni | 97.7% | 554 | 96.7% |
kath61 | 96.9% | 1,409 | 96.5% |
brandon | 97.5% | 527 | 96.5% |
smoke | 98.5% | 265 | 96.5% |
torch511 | 98.1% | 320 | 96.4% |
Easiest Typefaces to Identify From This Character
typeface | right | total | bayesian |
---|---|---|---|
Monaco | 92.6% | 19,283 | 86.3% |
Georgia | 90.5% | 22,258 | 86.0% |
Andale Mono | 93.6% | 12,650 | 85.9% |
Didot | 86.3% | 175,092 | 85.8% |
Futura | 85.9% | 143,197 | 85.5% |
Hardest Typefaces to Identify From This Character
typeface | right | total | bayesian |
---|---|---|---|
Optima | 74.1% | 215,977 | 76.7% |
Verdana | 75.8% | 203,668 | 78.1% |
Helvetica Neue | 76% | 219,951 | 78.1% |
Times New Roman | 78.5% | 220,202 | 80.0% |
Garamond | 80.7% | 116,237 | 82.2% |
Easiest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character
typeface pair | right | total | bayesian |
---|---|---|---|
Didot vs Gill Sans | 98% | 8,576 | 95.1% |
Didot vs Futura | 95.2% | 20,207 | 94.1% |
Baskerville vs Futura | 97.4% | 5,231 | 93.6% |
Baskerville vs Helvetica Neue | 96.2% | 5,315 | 92.9% |
Arial vs Didot | 99.4% | 2,581 | 92.8% |
Baskerville vs Gill Sans | 95.9% | 5,222 | 92.7% |
Gill Sans vs Times New Roman | 94.4% | 8,532 | 92.5% |
Baskerville vs Verdana | 95.4% | 5,157 | 92.4% |
Futura vs Times New Roman | 93.1% | 20,295 | 92.3% |
Arial vs Baskerville | 98.1% | 2,523 | 92.2% |
Hardest Typeface Pairs to Distinguish With This Character
typeface pair | right | total | bayesian |
---|---|---|---|
Helvetica Neue vs Verdana | 51.9% | 37,353 | 55.0% |
Garamond vs Optima | 59.2% | 14,794 | 64.8% |
Garamond vs Times New Roman | 61.5% | 14,795 | 66.7% |
Optima vs Times New Roman | 64.9% | 43,430 | 66.7% |
Futura vs Gill Sans | 59.1% | 8,477 | 67.7% |
Arial vs Helvetica Neue | 50.6% | 3,716 | 68.9% |
Baskerville vs Optima | 64.5% | 5,506 | 73.7% |
Arial vs Verdana | 52.8% | 2,424 | 73.8% |
Helvetica Neue vs Optima | 73.4% | 43,066 | 74.5% |
Baskerville vs Garamond | 66.1% | 5,313 | 74.9% |